Repository navigation
fix(deed): split the container-templates line under the 998-octet cap - #93
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Line breaks only, at the :purpose and :overview keys; words unchanged. Matches the template's current 3-line form. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0136P7Zm6f3TYUpUuzGd5KAQ
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.
 |
|
hyperpolymath
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2026
… unproven (#94) Owner ruling (via the hub): record the mint answers that are proven, blank the nine that are not, invent nothing. Adds a `(mint-answers)` clause after `(provenance)`. The evidence for every value is `.machine_readable/ai/PLACEHOLDERS.adoc`, whose value column the old mint filled in place (cross-checked against SPDX headers, `SECURITY.md`, `CITATION.cff` and the deed's `:minted-at`). Proven and recorded: `:project-name`, `:repo`, `:owner`, `:author`, `:author-email`, `:author-org`, `:description`, `:forge`, `:security-email`, `:conduct-email`, `:website`, `:mint-date`. Left `""` and marked UNPROVEN in a deed comment: `:project-type`, `:service-name`, `:port`, `:registry`, `:package-uuid`, `:archetype`, `:author-email-alt`, `:openssf-bp-id` and `:author-orcid` (its PLACEHOLDERS.adoc row is still an unfilled token). Note: `:project-name` is `Mathesis` (PLACEHOLDERS.adoc, `.envrc`, README) while `:repo` is `mathesis`. `:author-org` is a proven blank (the PLACEHOLDERS row is empty). The primary, security and conduct emails are the GitHub noreply address that PLACEHOLDERS.adoc and `SECURITY.md` carry, not the author's mailbox. `check-mint-drift.sh`: this repository's older template pin has no `check-mint-drift.sh`. I started a replay with the template's copy of the script at the recorded commit 4e66353; it had not finished when I opened this PR, so I claim nothing about its result. Container-templates line: the over-cap DEED finding on line 238 is still on main and is fixed by #93. This PR does not touch that line, so it merges cleanly in either order, but its DEED check stays red until #93 merges. What this does not do: - It adds no `(provenance)` clause (the deed already has one) and touches no `(anchor)` clause, no `:repo-uuid` and not the container-templates line. - It does not declare the drift that `check-mint-drift.sh` reports. That is a separate step (`(variant (paths …))`). DEED linter: the findings are identical before and after this change (checked with the local newer standards linter at 615aeb9; CI's pinned linter may differ, and I did not run it). On a temp copy with the two unrelated findings neutralised, the linter passes (rc 0), so the new clause parses and every added line is under the 998-octet cap. Not proven here: a CI run on this branch. https://claude.ai/code/session_0136P7Zm6f3TYUpUuzGd5KAQ --- _Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)_ Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
container-templatesdirectory clause in the deed has a line over the 998-octet cap (1159 octets), which the DEED syntax check rejects.This splits it at the
:purposeand:overviewkeys into the template's current 3-line form. Line breaks only: the words are unchanged (checked by comparing the text with whitespace collapsed, before and after). No line is over the cap after the change, and the DEED linter reports no length finding.Only that one clause changes. Nothing else in the deed is touched. Separate from any other open PR.
Not proven here: a full CI run on this branch.
Generated by Claude Code