Repository navigation
docs(deed): record the proven mint answers, nine fields left blank as unproven - #94
Merged
Merged
Conversation
… unproven Add a (mint-answers) clause after (provenance). Values are the ones .machine_readable/ai/PLACEHOLDERS.adoc proves (its value column was filled in place by the old mint). Nine fields are left empty and said to be unproven in a deed comment: project-type, service-name, port, registry, package-uuid, archetype, author-email-alt, openssf-bp-id and (where not proven) author-orcid. Nothing is invented. No anchor clause or :repo-uuid is touched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0136P7Zm6f3TYUpUuzGd5KAQ
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.
 |
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Owner ruling (via the hub): record the mint answers that are proven, blank the nine that are not, invent nothing.
Adds a
(mint-answers)clause after(provenance). The evidence for every value is.machine_readable/ai/PLACEHOLDERS.adoc, whose value column the old mint filled in place (cross-checked against SPDX headers,SECURITY.md,CITATION.cffand the deed's:minted-at).Proven and recorded:
:project-name,:repo,:owner,:author,:author-email,:author-org,:description,:forge,:security-email,:conduct-email,:website,:mint-date.Left
""and marked UNPROVEN in a deed comment::project-type,:service-name,:port,:registry,:package-uuid,:archetype,:author-email-alt,:openssf-bp-idand:author-orcid(its PLACEHOLDERS.adoc row is still an unfilled token).Note:
:project-nameisMathesis(PLACEHOLDERS.adoc,.envrc, README) while:repoismathesis.:author-orgis a proven blank (the PLACEHOLDERS row is empty). The primary, security and conduct emails are the GitHub noreply address that PLACEHOLDERS.adoc andSECURITY.mdcarry, not the author's mailbox.check-mint-drift.sh: this repository's older template pin has nocheck-mint-drift.sh. I started a replay with the template's copy of the script at the recorded commit 4e66353; it had not finished when I opened this PR, so I claim nothing about its result.Container-templates line: the over-cap DEED finding on line 238 is still on main and is fixed by #93. This PR does not touch that line, so it merges cleanly in either order, but its DEED check stays red until #93 merges.
What this does not do:
(provenance)clause (the deed already has one) and touches no(anchor)clause, no:repo-uuidand not the container-templates line.check-mint-drift.shreports. That is a separate step ((variant (paths …))).DEED linter: the findings are identical before and after this change (checked with the local newer standards linter at 615aeb9; CI's pinned linter may differ, and I did not run it). On a temp copy with the two unrelated findings neutralised, the linter passes (rc 0), so the new clause parses and every added line is under the 998-octet cap.
Not proven here: a CI run on this branch.
https://claude.ai/code/session_0136P7Zm6f3TYUpUuzGd5KAQ
Generated by Claude Code