Repository navigation
tasks: doc comment back on retry_unstored_hands - #903
Conversation
The flush_unstored_hands change (#897) put its doc comment between the doc block of retry_unstored_hands and that fn, so the bounded-retry note now documented the wrong function. Move it back. Generated-by: claude-code/claude-haiku-5-5 Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
98910bd to
8cdd55b
Compare
Validate pull request 903 against the current released source. Generated-by: codex/gpt-6
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed integration commit 3bf0077f64787ea9035ff141267750adb2ce2bd8 against 15c3d730814f5e9465b6dc0b34073052b071fee3 using the shared local review runner and independent Standards and Spec reviewers.
Standards
No substantive violations found. The existing four-line documentation block now immediately precedes retry_unstored_hands, and exit-flush documentation remains on flush_unstored_hands. This is a focused documentation correction with no executable, architecture, strategy or performance change.
Spec
No findings. The move matches the follow-up to #897: the retry documentation accurately describes the unchanged tuple return, watermark handling and bounded requeue behavior. No scope expansion.
Validation: exact-commit full gate passed: 892 tests passed, 0 failed, 4 ignored; 35 test binaries. No behavior or performance change requiring simulation or measurement.
Summary: Standards 0 findings; Spec 0 findings.
Generated-by: codex/gpt-6
Follow-up to #897 (PR #901/#902). The doc block for
retry_unstored_handshad ended up onflush_unstored_hands. Doc-only move;scripts/check.sh fullgreen.Generated-by: claude-code/claude-haiku-5-5
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Validation refreshed at
3bf0077f64787ea9035ff141267750adb2ce2bd8against current main: shared local review runner/full gate passed, 892 passed, 0 failed, 4 ignored, 35 binaries. Independent Standards and Spec reviews found no substantive issues.Generated-by: codex/gpt-6