Skip to content

Added support for reading patchliner e data (different chip layout) - #43

Merged
MichaelClerx merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
patchliner-e
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

MichaelClerx merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
patchliner-e

Conversation

@MichaelClerx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

New patchliner uses the same data format, so all the hard bits should be the same. This PR replaces the hardcoded chip layout with one read from the json meta data.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.71%. Comparing base (dee3dec) to head (25ef764).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #43      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.67%   97.71%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         258      263       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits          252      257       +5     
  Misses          6        6              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kwabenantim kwabenantim left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like the list of well labels was transposed compared to the data. The Syncropatch data has "Chiplayout":{"WP_nCols":24,"WP_nRows":16} which became a 24 x 16 list-of-lists containing the labels.

Comment thread syncropatch_export/trace.py Outdated
Comment thread syncropatch_export/trace.py
Comment thread syncropatch_export/trace.py Outdated
Comment thread syncropatch_export/trace.py Outdated
Comment thread syncropatch_export/trace.py Outdated
MichaelClerx and others added 2 commits October 8, 2026 10:50
@MichaelClerx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Thanks @kwabenantim ! I added a note that the internal matrix is confusing and added tests for this too. Great catch!

@kwabenantim kwabenantim left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@MichaelClerx
MichaelClerx merged commit d9409a8 into main Oct 8, 2026
8 checks passed
@MichaelClerx
MichaelClerx deleted the patchliner-e branch October 8, 2026 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants