Skip to content

Report invalid input Jass instead of dropping it - #1429

Merged
Frotty merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/jass-empty-type
Oct 11, 2026
Merged

Frotty merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/jass-empty-type

Conversation

@Frotty

@Frotty Frotty commented Oct 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The Jass grammar allowed an empty type, so local x = 1 parsed without error. The transformer then hit a NullPointerException and swallowed it, so the declaration and the rest of the file were dropped silently.

  • Jass.g4: no empty type, no type slot in function calls
  • The transformer reports the exception as an error
  • The error listener no longer reports errors at the end of a file at the file's first character

Tests: JassSyntaxErrorTests, CliBuildMapTests.theCliBuildFailsOnInvalidJassInTheMapScript.

The Jass grammar let a type be empty, so `local hero = "h"` parsed as a
local without a type. Translating it threw a NullPointerException, which
AntlrJassParseTreeTransformer swallowed: the declaration and the rest of
the file were dropped with no error, and the build shipped the result.
The same held for an untyped global or parameter, `local array a` and a
missing return type, and `call f integer(x)` was accepted as `call f(x)`.

- Jass.g4: jassTypeExpr has no empty alternative, and exprFunctionCall
  no longer takes a type between the name and the arguments.
- The transformer reports a NullPointerException as an error at the
  declaration it failed in, rather than ignoring it.
- WurstAntlrErrorListener re-evaluates its whitespace check while moving
  an error's start back. It never re-evaluated it, so an error at the
  end of the file or at a newline was reported at the file's first
  character.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-11T07:18:57.787482Z 135b39c PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 135b39cb40

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@Frotty
Frotty merged commit 04ac5c5 into master Oct 11, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant