Conversation
|
UI-wise, I believe turning it into a decoupled, specific property would be better: say, "brownian_tree_rng=cpu" instead of "brownian_tree_cpu". Then, we could consider if having a "brownian_tree_rng" implies turning on "brownian_tree". Either way sounds fine to me, so it'd be up to leejet. Code-wise, the name -> subclass mapping is replicating About the functionality itself... to be honest, I'm not sure what would be the best approach. Note that the |
|
@wbruna, then maybe this, as you suggested:
I didn't test it yet, but it compiles. |
Addition for leejet#1899.