[ovitrif]

Refs: #1028

This PR makes master pass the SwiftFormat check again.

Description

• Wraps the single-line if !stacked { Spacer(minLength: 0) } in ActivityRow.swift onto its own lines. It came in with fix: improve usdt deposit accessibility #1002, merged just before chore: fix all lints and enforce warnings as errors #1028 added the SwiftFormat lint job, so master has failed that job since.

Design

N/A — no UI changes.

Preview

N/A — no user-visible changes.

QA Notes

Journeys

N/A — no user-visible behaviour change.

Manual Tests

N/A

Automated Checks

N/A

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-20T03:56:09.138292Z	617524f	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[greptile-apps]

Confidence Score: 5/5

[Low impact] This formatting-only change appears safe to merge.

Summary

Expands the if !stacked block in ActivityRow.swift onto separate lines for SwiftFormat.

• Activity rows keep their spacer rule in SwiftFormat’s multiline style.

_{Reviews (1) · Last reviewed commit: "chore: wrap the activity row spacer for ..." · Reviewed by Greptile}

[talosmachina]

No findings. Wraps the one-line if !stacked { Spacer(minLength: 0) } in ActivityRowContent onto three lines so master passes the SwiftFormat lint job. Reviewed 617524f, light tier.

What I checked, and 0 candidates I ruled out

Read in full: ActivityRowContent.body around the hunk (lines 96-110 at the head)
Behaviour: none changed. The if body, condition and position inside the layout { } builder are identical, so the stacked and unstacked layouts render as before.
CI: SwiftFormat passes on this head, which is the point of the PR; Run Tests, Run Integration Tests and build-local were still pending when I reviewed. iOS does not build on this reviewer's Linux host, so this review is from the code and CI.

Merge confidence: 5/5, a whitespace-only change that a test would not apply to and the lint job it targets is green; the test jobs were still running at review time, and nothing in this diff can move them.

[jvsena42]

No issues found. The change in ActivityRow.swift:104-106 is formatting only: if !stacked { Spacer(minLength: 0) } is split across lines with the same condition, body and position. SwiftFormat and the unit and integration tests pass at 617524f; e2e-tests-local is still pending.

Device gate: no device check needed (formatting only); perf: not relevant; l10n: no UI text changed.

[ovitrif]

Superseded by #1040, which makes the same ActivityRow.swift change and also fixes the two files that #871 brought in.