Skip to content

docs(privacy): describe Cloud statistics terms and local choice - #23

Merged
frahlg merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/cloud-statistics-terms
Oct 17, 2026
Merged

frahlg merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/cloud-statistics-terms

Conversation

@frahlg

@frahlg frahlg commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Explain the planned Cloud terms in Swedish and English: everyone who uses FTW Cloud contributes to statistics, with no separate statistics switch. Local FTW users get a Yes/No question with Yes suggested, and no new upload before an answer. Older choices do not accept the new scope.

The page states that hourly collection is still off while Sourceful reviews the legal basis and DPIA. It lists fields, rounding, the proposed 13-month retention, public group thresholds and deletion, including offline limits. Reports in Cloud are personal data; configured power is not proof of control. Daily report averages estimate active reporting installations, not people or all-time installs.

Paired with srcfl/ftw#1700, srcfl/ftw-cloud#32 and srcfl/ftw-app#87. The current daily-report feed and stats dashboard are already live through Cloud. This text does not activate household collection or claim a signed review.

Validation: inspected both rendered languages in a browser; HTML diff and whitespace check pass. No build step.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-17T14:54:47.182829Z 74942f3 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@frahlg
frahlg merged commit 62cb225 into main Oct 17, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant