Repository navigation
S3UTILS-256 Write the S3C 10.1 replication format in crrExistingObjects #419
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
nicolas2bert
wants to merge
5
commits into
development/1.19
Choose a base branch
from
bugfix/S3UTILS-256/crrExistingObjects-metadata-format
base: development/1.19
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+940
−535
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9e36122
S3UTILS-256 Write the S3C 10.1 replication format in crrExistingObjects
nicolas2bert 49053fe
S3UTILS-256 bump package json
nicolas2bert a0bc2aa
S3UTILS-256 address review comments
nicolas2bert c2da17b
S3UTILS-256 address review comments
nicolas2bert bb23826
S3UTILS-256 split crrExistingObjects metadata update and write one fo…
nicolas2bert File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "s3utils", | ||
| "version": "1.19.2", | ||
| "version": "1.19.3", | ||
| "engines": { | ||
| "node": ">= 22" | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
STORAGE_TYPEis now ignored too (README says so, andReplicationStatusUpdaternever readsthis.storageTypeanymore), but unlikeFORCE_USING_CONFIGURATIONit gets no warning. Operators who set it for public cloud sites won't know it has no effect. Warn the same way, and consider dropping the deadstorageTypeparam from the constructor.