Skip to content

[Snyk] Upgrade vanilla-jsoneditor from 3.5.0 to 3.13.0 - #5

Open
Juice10 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-upgrade-406073f5aa4763d10dfcc63c34201ff9
Open

Juice10 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-upgrade-406073f5aa4763d10dfcc63c34201ff9

Conversation

@Juice10

@Juice10 Juice10 commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade vanilla-jsoneditor from 3.5.0 to 3.13.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 9 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released 3 months ago.

Issues fixed by the recommended upgrade:

Issue Score Exploit Maturity
high severity Arbitrary Code Injection
SNYK-JS-LODASHES-15869627
430 No Known Exploit
medium severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASHES-15869621
430 No Known Exploit
medium severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASHES-15053836
430 No Known Exploit

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: Low

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade vanilla-jsoneditor from 3.5.0 to 3.13.0.

See this package in yarn:
vanilla-jsoneditor

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.eu.snyk.io/org/rrweb-b.v.-default/project/27ea8c8b-35ef-48e8-8a9b-5818716230f3?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@Juice10

Juice10 commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Merge Risk: Low

This is a minor version upgrade that includes new features, bug fixes, and dependency updates. The official release notes for the versions between 3.5.0 and 3.13.0 do not indicate any breaking changes.

Key changes in this range are additive and include:

  • Improved sorting for arrays with mixed content types.
  • A new feature to make the maximum document size in text mode optionally configurable.

Significant breaking changes, such as the constructor changing from new JSONEditor to createJSONEditor, were introduced in version 3.0.0 and should not affect users already on version 3.5.0.

Source: GitHub Releases

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: b51f63f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-10T05:31:32.929104Z b51f63f PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants