[forkline-bot]

Summary

• Bump version to 0.21.0 (MINOR bump due to new )
• Update dependency crates (tokio, zbus, psl, syn, serde_json, sha2, toml, libc)
• Update CHANGELOG.md

---

This PR was generated by Forkline — AI-powered code contributions.
The agent analyzed the release request and implemented this version bump autonomously.

[forkline-bot]

Maintainability Review

Initial expected implementation: matched
Initial reason: PR description states this is a release PR for v0.21.0 with MINOR bump (new feature), dependency updates, and CHANGELOG update. All components present and correctly implemented.
Applied maintenance work: none
Final implementation: matches
Validation: Version consistency, CHANGELOG accuracy, feature wiring, test coverage, and documentation verified.

---

Summary

This is a well-executed release PR. The version bump is complete and consistent, the CHANGELOG is accurate, and the main feature (automatic Git pushing) is properly implemented with good test coverage and documentation.

Verification Performed

1. Version consistency ✓ — All workspace crates use . Cargo.lock correctly updated. No hardcoded version strings found outside CHANGELOG.

2. CHANGELOG accuracy ✓ — Properly formatted following Keep a Changelog. Lists the main feature and all 16 dependency updates with commit references.

3. Feature implementation ✓ — configuration option properly wired through:

   • Config structure ()
   • Agent config ()
   • Main binary reads config and passes to storage adapter
   • Storage adapter passes to
   • correctly implements commit-only mode using

4. Test coverage ✓ — Integration tests added for config parsing, CLI overrides, and agent profile isolation. Unit test added for commit-only Git behavior.

5. Documentation ✓ — README.md and updated with clear explanations of the new settings and their interaction with agent profiles.

Findings

No maintainability issues found that are worth addressing. The implementation is complete, correct, and follows existing patterns. The code quality is good with proper error handling and clear comments.

Priority: low
Category: review
Decision: do not pursue
Location: N/A
Problem: None identified
Action: No changes needed
Why it is worth it: N/A
Risk / scope: N/A

---

This review was generated by Forkline — AI-powered code contributions.