Repository navigation
dao RFC: note current lock-size rule - #453
Merged
Merged
Conversation
doitian
approved these changes
May 1, 2026
janx
force-pushed
the
pr/dao-lock-size-rule-note
branch
from
October 26, 2026 12:01
064908d to
aedb39d
Compare
Member
|
Removed broken link and shortened sentence. |
janx
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Current CKB nodes enforce a same-size lock rule between Nervos DAO deposit cells and phase-1 withdrawing cells, but RFC 0023 did not mention that implementation constraint.
Changes
MUSTnote in Withdraw Phase 1Gotchasnote pointing to the upstream verifier and public Meepo hardfork writeupKeep up the Great Work, Phroi