[18202781743]

Replace emit/signals:/slots: with Q_EMIT/Q_SIGNALS:/Q_SLOTS: to avoid naming conflicts with pure C++ or third-party libraries.

Also adds QT_NO_KEYWORDS compile definition in CMakeLists.txt and fixes SPDX copyright year ranges.

Related issue: DDE-499

Summary by Sourcery

Adopt Qt’s macro-based signal and slot declarations throughout the project and enable keyword suppression in the build configuration.

Enhancements:

• Replace Qt signal and slot keywords with Q_EMIT, Q_SIGNALS, and Q_SLOTS across the project to support QT_NO_KEYWORDS and avoid naming conflicts with C++ and third-party libraries.

Build:

• Enable the QT_NO_KEYWORDS compile definition for the main project and plugin targets.

Chores:

• Update SPDX copyright year ranges across affected source files.

[deepin-ci-robot]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[sourcery-ai]

Sorry @18202781743, your pull request is larger than the review limit of 150,000 diff characters

[deepin-ci-robot]

deepin pr auto review

🤖 AI 代码审查报告

总体评分： 100 分 (通过阈值: 70分)

---

📊 总体评价

项目	结果
审查结论	代码审查通过
评分详情	本次提交将 Qt 小写关键字（emit/signals/slots）统一替换为宏形式（Q_EMIT/Q_SIGNALS/Q_SLOTS）， 并在多个 CMakeLists.txt 中添加 QT_NO_KEYWORDS 编译定义。变更属于纯机械式重构， 语法正确、逻辑无变化、性能无影响、无安全风险。版权年份同步更新合理。四维度均通过。

---

🔍 详细分析

1. 语法逻辑 ✅

评价： 语法正确，逻辑清晰 ✅ 通过

潜在问题：
✅ 未发现明显问题

建议： []

---

2. 代码质量 ✅

评价： 代码结构清晰，注释完整 ✅ 通过

潜在问题：
✅ 未发现明显问题

建议： []

---

3. 代码性能 ✅

评价： 性能良好，资源使用合理 ✅ 通过

潜在问题：
✅ 未发现明显问题

建议： []

---

4. 代码安全 🔒

评价： 存在0个安全漏洞 ✅ 通过

🔐 发现 0 个安全漏洞

安全漏洞详情：
✅ 未发现安全漏洞

建议： []

---

💡 改进建议代码示例

---

本报告由 AI 代码审查工具自动生成

[deepin-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743, BLumia

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• debian/deepin/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment