trade-study compares simulation configurations against multiple objectives.
Define factors, build parameter grids, run replicated study phases, and
extract Pareto fronts using a simulator and scorer supplied by the caller.
The experimental Slurm launch layer runs explicit Python tasks from a frozen commit, with checked imports, task logs and guarded resume.
A study may need grids, simulation runs, scoring, and comparisons across
several phases. trade-study represents these steps with explicit factors,
objectives, and phase filters. Users supply a Simulator to generate data
and a Scorer to evaluate it. The package handles grid construction,
replicated execution, Pareto extraction, and phase chaining. Optional
dependencies add parallel execution, sampled designs, and other integrations.
This package targets researchers and practitioners who need:
- structured multi-phase experimental design (screen → refine → benchmark),
- multi-objective Pareto analysis across heterogeneous factors, and
- a reproducible Python API that separates domain logic from study orchestration.
| Operation | Interface |
|---|---|
| Parameter grid | build_grid with full factorial, LHS, Sobol, or Halton designs |
| Multi-objective ranking | extract_front(scores, directions) |
| Phased studies | Study, Phase, and phase filters such as top_k_pareto_filter |
| Adaptive search | run_adaptive with an Optuna integration |
| Repeated evaluation and storage | Simulator and Scorer protocols, save_results, and load_results |
Optional integrations use Optuna for adaptive search,
pymoo for Pareto algorithms, and
SALib for sensitivity analysis.
Study and Phase connect these operations across stages.
This complete example needs NumPy and the pareto extra:
pip install 'trade-study[pareto]'. Each replicate uses the same sample bank
for both designs, so errors can be compared in pairs.
import numpy as np
from trade_study import (
Direction, Factor, FactorType, Observable, build_grid,
extract_front, paired_difference, run_grid,
)
class SampleMean:
def generate(self, config, *, rep=0):
rng = np.random.default_rng(np.random.SeedSequence([2026, rep]))
return 0.0, rng.normal(size=32)[:config["samples"]]
class ErrorAndCost:
def score(self, truth, observed, config):
return {"error": float((observed.mean() - truth)**2),
"cost": float(config["samples"])}
grid = build_grid(
[Factor("samples", FactorType.DISCRETE, levels=[8, 32])], method="full"
)
observables = [Observable("error", Direction.MINIMIZE),
Observable("cost", Direction.MINIMIZE)]
results = run_grid(SampleMean(), ErrorAndCost(), grid, observables, n_reps=64)
means = results.aggregate_replicates()
front = extract_front(means.scores, [o.direction for o in observables])
contrast = paired_difference(results, {"samples": 32}, {"samples": 8},
"error", seed=2026)
print(means.scores, front, contrast.mean, contrast.n_pairs)results retains all 128 trial rows; means has one row per design. Bootstrap
resamples in the paired interval do not increase the number of independent
replicates. Inspect n_pairs: this helper excludes nonfinite pairs. A study
must define its failure policy before interpreting a success-only comparison.
Positive objective scaling preserves Pareto membership; use decision preferences
when choosing among nondominated designs.
The typed standalone version is replicated_study.py. The capabilities and example checks map additional APIs, optional dependencies, and executable examples.
For a complete 15-minute demonstration with live code and saved figures, see
the serosurvey design notebook and
presentation guide.
From a repository checkout, launch it with
uv run --extra notebook jupyter lab examples/serosurvey_study.ipynb.
Users implement two protocols to plug in their domain:
from trade_study import Scorer, Simulator
class MySimulator:
"""Implements the Simulator protocol."""
def generate(self, config: dict) -> tuple:
"""Return (truth, observations) for a given config."""
...
class MyScorer:
"""Implements the Scorer protocol."""
def score(self, truth, observations, config: dict) -> dict[str, float]:
"""Return {observable_name: value} for a single trial."""
...pip install trade-study[all]Or install only the extras you need:
pip install trade-study[design,pareto]| Extra | Packages | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
design |
pyDOE3, SALib, scipy | Grid construction and sensitivity screening |
pareto |
pymoo | Non-dominated sorting and indicators |
scoring |
scoringrules | Proper scoring rules (CRPS, WIS, etc.) |
stacking |
arviz, scipy | Bayesian and score-based ensemble weights |
adaptive |
optuna | Adaptive multi-objective search (NSGA-II) |
parallel |
joblib | Parallel grid execution |
viz |
matplotlib | Plot scores and Pareto fronts |
surrogate |
scikit-learn | GP/RF score and regime surrogates |
dataframe |
pandas | ResultsTable export for analysis and CSV |
all |
All of the above | |
notebook |
JupyterLab, nbconvert, matplotlib, pandas, pymoo | Execute and present example notebooks |
Core dependency: numpy only.
The snippets below show API composition; names such as world, scorer,
run_fn and results stand for caller-supplied objects. Use the complete
quickstart above or a worked guide to run a study.
from trade_study import Factor, FactorType, build_grid, screen
factors = [
Factor("x", FactorType.CONTINUOUS, bounds=(0.0, 1.0)),
Factor("method", FactorType.CATEGORICAL, levels=["a", "b", "c"]),
]
grid = build_grid(factors, method="sobol", n_samples=1024)
si = screen(run_fn, factors, method="morris", n_trajectories=3000)from trade_study import run_grid, run_adaptive
# Grid mode: evaluate all configs (optional parallelism)
results = run_grid(world, scorer, grid, observables, n_jobs=-1)
# Adaptive mode: evolutionary multi-objective optimization (Optuna NSGA-II)
results = run_adaptive(world, scorer, factors, observables, n_trials=600)from trade_study import extract_front, hypervolume, pareto_rank
front_idx = extract_front(results.scores, directions)
ranks = pareto_rank(results.scores, directions)
hv = hypervolume(results.scores[front_idx], ref_point, directions)from trade_study import stack_scores, stack_bayesian, stack_proportional, ensemble_predict
weights = stack_scores(score_matrix) # select best means; split exact ties
weights = stack_proportional(score_matrix) # preserve weight across near ties
weights = stack_bayesian(idata_dict) # arviz stacking (Yao et al. 2018)
combined = ensemble_predict(predictions, weights)stack_scores solves the supplied linear-score objective directly using NumPy;
positive changes of score units preserve its optimum. ensemble_predict
normalizes a copy of the weights and accepts read-only arrays and views.
See choosing ensemble weights for examples and the
distinction between input scores and the score of a combined prediction.
from trade_study import save_results, load_results
save_results(results, "study_results")
results = load_results("study_results")
frame = results.to_dataframe() # optional pandas extra; includes trial metadata
frame.to_csv("study_results.csv", index=False)from trade_study import run_successive_halving, run_hyperband, fit_surrogate, fit_regime_surrogate
# Cheap-first budget-constrained screening
results = run_successive_halving(world, scorer, factors, observables, budget_param="maxiters")
results = run_hyperband(world, scorer, factors, observables, budget_param="maxiters")
# Interpolate scores from a completed results table (GP or RF)
surrogate = fit_surrogate(results, method="gp")
# Recommend a config per regime, interpolating over regime descriptors
regime_surrogate = fit_regime_surrogate(results, regime_cols=["n", "p"])Surrogate fits report cross-validated cv_r2 and cv_rmse; check those
diagnostics before trusting recommendations or post-hoc sensitivity results.
Constraint / feasibility_filter express infeasible regions of the
design space; FactorConstraint couples factors during grid
construction (e.g. keep x + y <= 1); screen() supports both Morris
and Sobol sensitivity analysis. run_grid(..., n_reps=N) supports replicated
trials, and sensitivity_from_table() estimates post-hoc sensitivity from an
existing results table through a validated surrogate.
Version 0.5.1 fixes score-unit sensitivity in stack_scores and prevents
ensemble_predict from modifying supplied weights, including read-only arrays
and views. It also updates executable documentation and illustrated examples.
Version 0.5.0 adds a prespecified fixed replication policy and versioned
replication-contract metadata. Adaptive allocation remains the default.
Pareto operations now identify the optional pareto extra when it is missing.
Version 0.4.0 adds decision reporting (preference_sweep() with regret,
practical equivalence and optional paired uncertainty), fixed-sample proportion
intervals and replicate sizing, versioned result bundles with provenance,
sequential replication (run_sequential(), with explicit fixed/adaptive policy
and recorded counts/uncertainty assumptions), evaluation caching, incremental
grid checkpoints with bounded retries, grouped surrogate validation with
support diagnostics, and the IVAC serosurvey notebook. The adaptive extra now
requires Optuna 4.5 or later, and strict </> adaptive constraints treat
exact equality as infeasible, matching result-table feasibility.
Version 0.3.0 adds replicated and paired studies, uncertainty diagnostics,
persistent adaptive sessions, checkpointing, and DataFrame export. Existing
phase-name-only checkpoints are refused; use a fresh checkpoint directory and
set checkpoint_key to track model/data revisions. Confidence constraints
require estimated standard errors rather than assuming unknown uncertainty is
zero. stack_proportional() now uses exponential score utilities in both
directions; set its temperature in score units to control concentration.
| Package | Description |
|---|---|
| TradeStudy.jl | Inactive design scaffold for a possible Julia port; it does not contain a usable implementation |
See CONTRIBUTING.md for setup, code standards, and the PR workflow.
uv sync --extra dev
just ci # lint → mypy --strict → pytest with coverage
just format # auto-format
just check # auto-fix lintIf you use this package in your research, please cite:
@software{trade_study2026,
author = {Macdonald, Joshua C.},
title = {{trade-study}: Multi-Objective Trade-Study Orchestration},
year = {2026},
url = {https://github.com/jcm-sci/trade-study},
version = {0.5.1},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.19599838},
}See CITATION.cff for machine-readable metadata.
MIT