Please report security issues privately, by email to dec986@gmail.com, rather than by opening an issue on the GitHub tracker, which is public.

It helps if you can include the version of Stats::LikeR, the output of perl -V (or at least nvtype, ivsize and useithreads — much of this module is C, and a memory bug there is often specific to an NV width or to a 32-bit IV), the platform, and a short script that shows the problem together with any input file it needs.

Stats::LikeR is maintained by one person, unpaid, so there is no guaranteed response time and no bounty. Reports are nevertheless taken seriously, and you will be credited in Changes for anything that leads to a fix unless you would rather not be.

Only the most recent release on CPAN. Fixes are shipped as a new release rather than as a patch to an older one.

Most of Stats::LikeR is XS. The statistics are computed in C, over buffers the module allocates and indexes itself, from data a caller may well have taken from somewhere untrusted. So anything in that path is in scope: an out-of-bounds read or write, a use-after-free, an integer overflow in a size computation, an unbounded allocation, or an outright crash, reached either from a Perl data structure handed to one of the functions or from a file read by read_table(). Dying with a croak on malformed input is the designed behaviour and is not a vulnerability; corrupting memory instead of croaking is.

read_table() is the one place the module parses a file format, and it is the most interesting surface here. A file whose name ends in .xlsx is read as the ZIP archive it is, and the fast path walks the archive's central directory and inflates the worksheet part with Compress::Raw::Zlib directly rather than going through IO::Uncompress::Unzip, so a malformed archive — impossible offsets, a local header whose sizes disagree with the central directory's, a member that decompresses to far more than it claims — is reaching code written here. Reports of that kind are welcome. Note that nothing in a spreadsheet is ever evaluated: no formulas, no external references, no eval of any kind on file content. A cell is data.

Out of scope:

• The random numbers. sample(), runif(), rnorm() and the rest draw from Drand01(), which is perl's own generator — the one behind rand() — so that srand($seed) makes a draw reproducible the way set.seed() does in R. That is deliberate and documented. It is not a cryptographic PRNG, and nothing here should be used to produce keys, tokens, salts, passwords or anything else that has to be unguessable.
• Paths the caller supplies. read_table() and write_table() open exactly the path they are given. A program that builds one out of untrusted data, or writes into a directory other users can write to, has the problem in the calling program, and Stats::LikeR will faithfully open whatever comes out of it.
• Resource use proportional to the input. A frame that is large because the caller asked for a large file to be read is not a denial of service. Memory that grows without bound on input that is small is, and is in scope.