Skip to content

Evaluate and Improve Example Workflows #219

Closed
2 of 2 issues completed
Closed

Description

@jerop

Problem

Currently, we have no systematic way to:

  • Measure how well these workflows perform their intended tasks
  • Test prompt improvements before deploying them
  • Compare different prompt variations or model configurations
  • Validate that changes don't regress quality
  • Provide quality benchmarks for the community

Solution

Use the Gemini CLI evaluation framework to systematically test and improve the effectiveness of prompts and configurations used in our example workflows. This will enable data-driven optimization of our provided workflows and give the community tools to evaluate their own Gemini CLI automations.

Dependencies

References

Activity

  1. added
    priority/p1Important and should be addressed in the near term
    on Aug 21, 2025
  2. removed
    priority/p1Important and should be addressed in the near term
    on Aug 22, 2025
  3. 15 remaining items

  4. added
    priority/p0Critical and urgent e.g., critical security vulnerability, major breakage
    on Nov 12, 2025
  5. self-assigned this
    on Nov 14, 2025
  6. removed this from the v0.1.15 milestone on Nov 18, 2025
  7. added this to the v0.1.18 milestone on Dec 9, 2025
  8. removed this from the v0.1.19 milestone on Dec 23, 2025
  9. removed their assignment
    on Dec 23, 2025
  10. self-assigned this
    on Feb 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

area/promptsarea/qualityTracks quality issueskind/enhancementNew feature or requestpriority/p0Critical and urgent e.g., critical security vulnerability, major breakage

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions