Skip to content

Add .NET servicing CQB status skill - #6761

Merged
dkurepa merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
dkurepa:dkurepa/CQBServicingSkill
Oct 21, 2026
Merged

dkurepa merged 2 commits into
dotnet:mainfrom
dkurepa:dkurepa/CQBServicingSkill

Conversation

@dkurepa

@dkurepa dkurepa commented Oct 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 6, 2026 15:25

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot review overview

🟡 Changes recommended

Root build resolution can return multiple candidates, making downstream status ambiguous.

Review effort: Balanced
Findings: 1 High severity

Open (1)
What changed in this PR

Adds a read-only skill for tracing .NET 8/9 servicing CQB state through PCS dependency flow and Azure DevOps CI.

Changes:

  • Documents the servicing dependency graph.
  • Defines CQB investigation, coherence, and safety rules.
  • Maps repositories to CI pipeline definitions.
File Description
docs/​dotnet-graph.mmd Defines servicing topology.
.github/​skills/​dotnet-servicing-cqb-status/​SKILL.md Implements the investigation workflow.
.github/​skills/​dotnet-servicing-cqb-status/​references/​repositories.md Maps repositories and pipelines.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment on lines +18 to +23
```powershell
darc get-latest-build --repo runtime --channel ".NET 8 Internal"
darc get-latest-build --repo runtime --channel ".NET 9 Internal"
```

Run only the command matching the selected product major. If the user explicitly supplies a runtime BAR build ID, use `darc get-build --id <runtime-build-id>` instead for a reproducible historical investigation.
@dkurepa
dkurepa merged commit 2d544f4 into dotnet:main Oct 21, 2026
3 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants