Skip to content

feat(evals): use OpenCode 1.18.31 for GPT-6 release runs - #129

Merged
vriesd merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feat/release-host-gpt6-sol
Sep 26, 2026
Merged

vriesd merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feat/release-host-gpt6-sol

Conversation

@vriesd

@vriesd vriesd commented Sep 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why

The standard release evaluator pins OpenCode 1.18.6, whose catalog does not list openai/gpt-6-sol. A release campaign using the requested OpenAI model needs a host that resolves it and a matching packaged plugin SDK.

Scope

Pin the release evaluator and @opencode-ai/plugin dependency to OpenCode 1.18.31, update bun.lock, and use openai/gpt-6-sol with xai/grok-4.6 in the release guide. Update current-host release and canary test fixtures. Historical study contracts and retained evidence remain unchanged.

Tradeoffs

The release host is part of the frozen release policy. This change requires a fresh two-provider campaign and exact-artifact canary. Earlier campaign evidence cannot be reused for the new host policy.

Blast Radius

The package's OpenCode plugin SDK and release evaluation host change together. The packed plugin loaded successfully in a model-free OpenCode 1.18.31 smoke. Model entitlement, billing, and qualification are still unmeasured.

Verification

Frozen bun install, bun run check, bun run replay, and bun run package:smoke passed. The full check recorded 1,585 passing tests, 20 intentional skips, and no failures. Replay matched all 13 cassettes. FLOW_OPENCODE_SMOKE_VERSION=1.18.31 FLOW_LIVE_SMOKE=1 bun test tests/live-opencode-smoke.test.ts passed all 22 checks without provider inference. The pinned host catalog lists openai/gpt-6-sol as active. No paid calls ran.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-26T21:50:55.865055Z bdff21f PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bdff21f81f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread evals/release-policy.ts
@vriesd

vriesd commented Sep 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Independent current-head verification at 44e36fef2d2b3598e0942ad3414a620d5c8c5619: PASS+NOTES.

The frozen install passed. Fifty-three focused release, canary, and qualification tests passed. The qualification CLI rejected a canary recorded on OpenCode 1.18.6 and sealed the same campaign with a 1.18.31 canary. The packed plugin loaded in a real OpenCode 1.18.31 process without model calls. All seven GitHub checks are green, and the branch has no merge conflict.

Note: GitHub Codex reviewed an earlier head. This head resolves its host-version finding. The release campaign must use the pinned 1.18.31 host; the local global opencode is 1.18.32.

@vriesd
vriesd merged commit 316fc31 into main Sep 26, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants