Rewrite the site copy in plain language - #24
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The marketing copy read like it was generated: em dash runs, mirrored triads, negation stacks and sales lines. This states the same claims directly. No number, product name or performance claim changes; the three Playwright assertions that quoted the old wording are updated to the new. The Proof section still carries the temporal-workflow comparison that was withdrawn on 2026-08-03. That copy is untouched here and needs its own change once the replacement wording is decided. Signed-off-by: Tim Paine <3105306+timkpaine@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The marketing copy read like it was generated: em dash runs, mirrored triads, negation stacks and sales lines. This states the same claims directly. No number, product name or performance claim changes. The three Playwright assertions that quoted the old wording are updated to the new;
pnpm lint,pnpm checkandpnpm test:integrationpass.Not in this change: the Proof section still carries the temporal-workflow comparison ("11.5 ms against 31.4 ms", "now beats the CPU baseline", "can outperform CPU execution") that was withdrawn on 2026-08-03. That copy is untouched here and needs its own change once the replacement wording is decided. There is also an inconsistency to resolve at the same time: About says dpv2 has 8 GB of DDR3, Proof says 10 GB (2 GB onboard plus 8 GB SODIMM).