Skip to content

docs(adr): record ADR 0007 spike finding — Q9 resolved (stdlib JWT, no new deps) - #14

Merged
ThomasK33 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/adr-0007-spike-finding-q9
Aug 27, 2026
Merged

docs(adr): record ADR 0007 spike finding — Q9 resolved (stdlib JWT, no new deps)#14
ThomasK33 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/adr-0007-spike-finding-q9

Conversation

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Records the ADR 0007 spike finding on main, as promised in a PR #4 comment, so it survives even if the spike branch goes stale.

What

Adds a Spike Findings section to docs/adr/0007-teams-adapter.md:

  • Open Question 9 resolved by the Teams adapter spike (Spike: Microsoft Teams Adapter (Bot Framework) (ADR 0007) #4, branch spike/msteams-adapter):
    • msbotbuilder-go is rejected as unmaintained.
    • Inbound JWT/JWKS validation was implemented with the standard library only (crypto/rsa over a public key rebuilt from the JWK n/e) — zero new dependencies; golang-jwt/jwx proved unnecessary.
  • Notes that the remaining open questions still require live validation against a real Azure Bot resource and Teams tenant before the ADR moves to Accepted.

The ADR status intentionally stays Proposed — it only flips to Accepted after live-tenant validation.

Related to #6 (does not close it — live-tenant validation is still outstanding).

Validation


Generated with mux • Model: anthropic:claude-fable-5 • Thinking: xhigh

…o new deps)

The Teams adapter spike (PR #4) resolved Open Question 9: msbotbuilder-go
is rejected as unmaintained, and inbound JWT/JWKS validation was
implemented with the standard library only (crypto/rsa), adding zero new
dependencies. Recorded on main so the finding survives the spike branch.

Remaining open questions still require live-tenant validation (issue #6);
the ADR status stays Proposed until then.

---
_Generated with [`mux`](https://github.com/coder/mux) • Model: `anthropic:claude-fable-5` • Thinking: `xhigh`_
@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 576c6bb870

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 576c6bb870

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/adr/0007-teams-adapter.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/adr/0007-teams-adapter.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/adr/0007-teams-adapter.md Outdated
…ce, scope Q9, add .scratch tracker issue

- Decision now records the stdlib-only JWT/JWKS choice (no contradictory
  'use golang-jwt/jwx' instruction left in ADR or PRD).
- Spike Findings scoped: Q9's SDK-adoption decision is resolved; its
  live-token verification steps are superseded and carry over into the
  live-validation checklist.
- Live validation now tracked in .scratch/teams-adapter/issues/01 per
  docs/agents/issue-tracker.md, with GitHub issue #6 as public mirror.

---
_Generated with [`mux`](https://github.com/coder/mux) • Model: `anthropic:claude-fable-5` • Thinking: `xhigh`_
@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4478198202

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4478198202

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .scratch/teams-adapter/PRD.md
…ation, not msbotbuilder-go evaluation

The PRD's final implementation gate still required a hands-on
production-readiness evaluation of msbotbuilder-go, which the ADR 0007
spike already performed and rejected. The gate now requires live-token
validation of the stdlib JWT/JWKS validator instead.

---
_Generated with [`mux`](https://github.com/coder/mux) • Model: `anthropic:claude-fable-5` • Thinking: `xhigh`_
@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@ThomasK33

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. More of your lovely PRs please.

Reviewed commit: 794f2e89a8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 794f2e89a8

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 merged commit 68efb93 into main Aug 27, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant