docs(8004): rename Related Protocols to the standard Related heading - #2341
Merged
Merged
Conversation
AGENTS.md section 3 names the two closing sections: Resources, then Related. The section's content already matched the Related spec - a bullet list of internal pages, each with a dash and a half-sentence - only the heading was non-standard. No redirect or link update needed: nothing in the repo links the #related-protocols anchor. Closes #2340. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 task
palango
approved these changes
Sep 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope, honestly
This is one line, and it is all that is left of #2340. I wrote that issue describing a page state that was already out of date when I filed it — work on the #2331 branch had already done the substantive parts. Rather than open a PR duplicating them, this covers only the remainder.
Here is #2340's acceptance criteria checked against the current
GigaHierz/erc8004-register-services-sectionhead:@chaoschain/sdkexample remainsgrep -c chaoschain→ 0tx.events.Transfer.returnValues.tokenIdgrep -c returnValues→ 0### RegisterheadingRegisteredon a mined receiptparseEventLogson the receipt## Related Protocols→## RelatedThe change
AGENTS.md §3 names the two closing sections:
## Resources, then## Related. The section's content already matched theRelatedspec — a bullet list of internal pages, each with a dash and a half-sentence on why. Only the heading was non-standard, so this renames the heading and touches nothing else.Why no redirect or link update
Renaming a heading changes its anchor, so I checked for inbound references:
Nothing links
#related-protocols, so there is nothing to update. Anchors are not page paths, so nodocs.jsonredirect applies.Conflict check with #2331
#2331 is open on the same file. It does not touch this section — the
## Related Protocolsblock is byte-identical onmainand on that branch:So these two merge cleanly in either order.
What this does NOT do
Four other pages carry the same class of non-standard closing heading, all
## Additional Resources, which AGENTS.md §3 also rules out:tooling/explorers/analytics.mdxbuild-on-celo/scaling-your-app.mdxbuild-on-celo/build-with-ai/vibe-coding.mdxbuild-on-celo/build-with-ai/mcp/index.mdxDeliberately not bundled. Each needs a judgement call this page did not — whether the content is a link table (
## Resources) or a bullet list of internal pages (## Related) — and that is a different review from a rename where the content already fits. Happy to do them as a follow-up if you want the family cleaned up.Verification
Closes #2340.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code