fix(examples): replace comma with dot in XmlnsUrl across fare examples

[assassinationss]

Fixes the invalid URIs reported in the issue: several fare examples have a comma instead of a dot between TLD and SLD in <XmlnsUrl> (http://www.myfares,com/fares).

I swept the whole repo for the same pattern — all 10 occurrences are in examples/functions/fares/, one <XmlnsUrl> per file — and fixed them all, not just the three files listed in the issue. No other content touched.

Closes #1063

[assassinationss]

Thanks @ue71603 and @skinkie for the double review. Happy to rebase or amend anything if needed before this lands.

[TuThoThai]

@assassinationss, thanks for cleaning the typos!

@thbar and I will cross-check the CI situation and this PR will be merged. Then, we will handle the backport to v2.1-wip

[thbar]

@thbar and I will cross-check the CI situation and this PR will be merged.

@TuThoThai I checked:

• the current (fix(examples): replace comma with dot in XmlnsUrl across fare examples #1082) PR comes from a fork by @assassinationss
• I recently added support to run CI for forks but only on v2.1-wip Fixed typo in nta examples in years (+ CI fix for forks) #1052
• we need to backport that fix to v2.0

[assassinationss]

@thbar — no rush at all, but if it helps: the fork-CI part of #1052 looks like a single hunk in .github/workflows/ci.yml (about 7 lines).

I'd be glad to prepare the v2.0 backport as a PR for your review if that saves you a chore — or equally happy to leave it in your hands, since it's your call how the branch is maintained.

[thbar]

@thbar — no rush at all, but if it helps: the fork-CI part of #1052 looks like a single hunk in .github/workflows/ci.yml (about 7 lines).

I'd be glad to prepare the v2.0 backport as a PR for your review if that saves you a chore — or equally happy to leave it in your hands, since it's your call how the branch is maintained.

@assassinationss thanks for the ping & offer to help. It turns out the backport in question is already available here for review!

• Backport #1052 into v2.0 #1083

(I also just merged #1077, so we'll see how things pan out)

[thbar]

(In theory once #1083 is merged, and the current #1082 made up-to-date, the idea is that the CI should complete here - if it does not I will investigate)

[thbar]

@TuThoThai after the 2 merge, + click on "approve workflow to run" (due to "external" contribution), the CI is started 😄 the hope is good.

[assassinationss]

Merged — thank you both! 🎉 Glad the v2.0 sync + workflow approval got the CI unstuck. Happy to help with anything else on the examples or docs.