Skip to content

feat: add Atlas Cloud provider preset - #925

Open
binyangzhu000-sudo wants to merge 65 commits into
TraderAlice:devfrom
binyangzhu000-sudo:codex/atlas-cloud-provider
Open

feat: add Atlas Cloud provider preset#925
binyangzhu000-sudo wants to merge 65 commits into
TraderAlice:devfrom
binyangzhu000-sudo:codex/atlas-cloud-provider

Conversation

@binyangzhu000-sudo

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • add Atlas Cloud to the built-in AI provider preset catalog
  • configure its OpenAI-compatible Chat Completions endpoint and default model
  • register the routed model semantics and keep credential injection defaults aligned

Verification

  • pnpm exec vitest run src/ai-providers/preset-catalog.spec.ts src/ai-providers/model-semantics.spec.ts src/workspaces/cli/shim.spec.ts services/uta/src/domain/trading/brokers/presets.spec.ts (80 passed)
  • pnpm exec tsc --noEmit
  • full pnpm test: 3828 passed, 9 skipped; two unrelated tests timed out under the full parallel run and passed when rerun in the focused set; the catalog-contract failure found by the full run was fixed before the focused rerun
  • parsed the preset and used its endpoint/model with the OpenAI client against the live Atlas Cloud API (123 models; default model present; chat completed)
  • git diff --check

Signed-off-by: binyangzhu000-sudo <224954946+binyangzhu000-sudo@users.noreply.github.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@binyangzhu000-sudo is attempting to deploy a commit to the luokerenx4's Team Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@RainMona

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

云端代理审阅(以 upstream dev @ 47e8651b 为准)

结论

仍可行动、值得接,但需重基 + CI 绿。

现状

  • presetProviders 仍无 Atlas Cloud;产品需求仍成立。
  • dev 有冲突(含 PLANS.md);需 rebase 到当前 dev
  • Checks:Vercel 授权噪声;项目 CI 未见到结果。

建议

  1. Rebase 到 dev,解冲 PLANS.md(不要带无关的计划行)。
  2. 确认仅触及 preset / 文档,不扩大到认证核心逻辑。
  3. 项目 CI 绿后再合入。

binyangzhu000-sudo and others added 24 commits August 17, 2026 13:36
Promote repaired 0.90.2 source to master
…90.2-beta.1

Prepare OpenAlice 0.90.2 beta 1
release: promote desktop upgrade smoke repair
…90.2-stable

chore(release): prepare v0.90.2
Promote dev to master for v0.91.0-beta.1
Promote repaired dev to master for v0.91.0-beta.1
…91.0-beta.1

Prepare OpenAlice 0.91.0 beta 1
Promote dev to master for v0.91.0-beta.2
Promote dev to master for v0.91.0-beta.3
Promote dev to master for v0.91.0-beta.4
luokerenx4 and others added 29 commits September 5, 2026 14:39
…91.1-beta.1

chore(release): prepare 0.91.1-beta.1
…91.1

chore(release): prepare 0.91.1 stable
…11-aur-fixture

Promote accepted AUR fixture repair for 0.91.1
…92.0-beta.1

Prepare 0.92.0-beta.1 release
Promote market data and Project CLI improvements for 0.92.1 beta
Promote Broker Pack fixes for v0.92.1-beta.2
chore: promote dev for v0.93.0 release
All three conflicts were the same both-sides-added-a-preset shape: upstream
added an openrouter entry in the exact rows this branch adds atlas-cloud, in
DEFAULT_MODEL_BY_PRESET and in the two matching spec expectations. Both
entries are kept everywhere, openrouter first in upstream's position.

Checked the auto-merged side too: the atlas-cloud entry in model-semantics.ts
survived the merge intact.

vitest src/ai-providers -> 42 passed; tsc --noEmit clean.
@binyangzhu000-sudo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Synced with master (1305 commits). All three conflicts were the same shape — upstream added an openrouter preset in the exact rows this branch adds atlas-cloud:

  • preset-catalog.tsDEFAULT_MODEL_BY_PRESET
  • preset-catalog.spec.ts → the two matching expectation objects

Both entries are kept everywhere, openrouter first in upstream's position.

I also checked the auto-merged side rather than assuming a clean merge is a correct one: the atlas-cloud entry in model-semantics.ts came through intact.

Verification on the merged branch:

  • vitest run src/ai-providers42 passed (3 files)
  • tsc --noEmit → clean

No conflicts remain.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants