Repository navigation
Conversation
This commit introduces a new Jupyter notebook (13-rankseg-postprocessing.ipynb) that compares argmax and RankSEG decoding of MicroNet probability maps. It utilizes a CoNSeP-trained model on Kumar test images, retaining TIAToolbox inference and instance postprocessing, and evaluates foreground Dice. The notebook includes visual comparisons and optional evaluations for all 14 test images.
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to #1172.
Thank you for suggesting an example notebook as a starting point. This PR adds a self-contained tutorial demonstrating RankSEG foreground decoding with TIAToolbox's MicroNet pipeline.
Summary
RankSEG is installed as an optional package within the notebook. Model weights and data are downloaded when needed.
Example results
Dice is computed per image and then averaged with equal weight.
The illustrated case is explicitly identified as a favorable example selected after reviewing the cohort. Results describe foreground overlap on this small cross-dataset cohort; instance-separation quality requires separate evaluation.
Validation
I would appreciate feedback on the notebook's structure and its use of the TIAToolbox 2.x inference API.