Skip to content

Consultation about the parameter values setting of getPointCloudPolarInd() #13

Description

@Dr-Yongqiang

Hello, the codebase you've developed is truly excellent! May I kindly inquire about the recommended settings for the parameters "peakDistance" and "peakProminence" when using the function getPointCloudPolarInd()?

Activity

  1. Samleo8 commented on Jan 17, 2024

    @Samleo8
    Owner

    Hi, sorry for the late reply. These are parameters come from, and are described in more detail in the original paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.05347.pdf

    I believe choosing them requires a little bit of trial-and-error, and would be related to the configurations/parameters specific to your radar sensor. Of course, you can tune the algorithm to be more or less sensitive to peaks by changing this params, but it is environment specific.

  2. atomicapple0 commented on Jan 17, 2024

    @atomicapple0
    Collaborator

    For getPointCloudPolarInd, we never actually ever pass in non None values for peakDistance or peakProminence in our code base. That function calls scipy.signal.find_peaks(azimuthReading, distance=peakDistance, prominence=peakProminence) so we just use the default scipy value. As @Samleo8 said, you may want to play around with various parameters based on your specific dataset.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions