You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In some cases, data of type "Not a Moth" is bloating our views, making the actual moth data more difficult to inspect. We should probably keep the "Not a Moth" data possible to inspect on demand (in some scenarios this is also interesting data), however by default it should probably be filtered out?
Implementation ideas:
Project setting
Taxa to exclude/hide by default (from Occurrences list, from charts)
Consider using a Taxa List
Should hide recursively - all children under Not a Moth
Need a way to show the hidden taxa on demand (filter or checkbox?)
Examples of when the "Not a Moth" data is taking over a bit:
I'm thinking something like this could be a start? A view for more detailed project configuration.
For the "root taxon", my idea is to use this for default filtering everywhere. We still want to make it possible to show hidden taxa on demand in a few selected views, but instead of all taxa being the default, we could fallback to the root taxon specified here. Maybe something similar for score?
When we introduce project settings like this, could also be a good time to include related configuration, for example make it possible to specify reject options for a project. Let's talk more in person!
Activity
annavik commentedon Jul 1, 2025
I'm thinking something like this could be a start? A view for more detailed project configuration.

For the "root taxon", my idea is to use this for default filtering everywhere. We still want to make it possible to show hidden taxa on demand in a few selected views, but instead of all taxa being the default, we could fallback to the root taxon specified here. Maybe something similar for score?
When we introduce project settings like this, could also be a good time to include related configuration, for example make it possible to specify reject options for a project. Let's talk more in person!
annavik commentedon Aug 28, 2025
Closing in favor of #927