Repository navigation
Benchmark: rows for LM-EnRML and GN-EnRML - #189
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds rows for the iterative ensemble smoothers LM-EnRML and GN-EnRML to the MiniRes benchmark, each with 4 iterations (as many updates as ES-MDA's 4 steps), and otherwise PET's defaults. The truncation is set in their
iterationblock, which is where they read it, to the 99% of the other rows.RESULTS.mdis not rerun here.Tentative numbers, from
run.py --quick(coarse case, 5 truths; means):Both accepted every step they tried: 250 simulations, i.e. the 50 members for the prior and for each of the 4 iterations.
Checked locally: the benchmark's smoke test, and ruff.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code