This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 15, 2026. It is now read-only.
added to draft: minimal example for exposing classes and methods using decorators - #8
Open
bernhardlang wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
bernhardlang wants to merge 3 commits into
bernhardlang wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using decorators for exposing instances and their methods to the sequencer (or any other unit) as discussed in Toulouse. By simply replacing the original class' init method, no need for fiddling around with dunder methods or functools. Looks pretty short and clean to me. What do you think?