Repository navigation
Optimize component host matching and add component-heavy benchmarks - #101
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Component discovery repeatedly builds selectors and calls
Element.matches()during DOM traversal. Cache a matcher by parser context-array identity and global registry size, using tag-name lookups for plain component names and retaining selector matching for other names. Pass the matcher directly through traversal and preserve its scope while nested binding runs.Changes
Validation
132 relevant tests, library and benchmark type checks, lint, and benchmark builds pass. Browser output checks pass for both frameworks at 500 rows; minidom scenarios pass at 500 and 2,000 rows.