Skip to content

Guardrails: Documentation and Testing #1309

Open
0 of 1 issue completed
Open

Description

@Prajna1999

Is your feature request related to a problem?
We currently lack a structured standalone evaluation dataset for all validators in guardrails. This absence makes it difficult to assess validator performance effectively.

Describe the solution you'd like

  • Create an evaluation sheet to be run periodically with validators.
  • Ensure the dataset is representative of different input types for each validator.
  • Report the findings in a structured document.
Original issue

Describe the current behavior
Currently we lack structured standalone eval dataset for all validators in guardrails.

Describe the enhancement you'd like
Create an eval sheet to be run periodically with validators. The dataset should be representative of different input types for individual validator. Report the findings in a structured document.

Why is this enhancement needed?
Explain the benefits (e.g., performance, usability, maintainability, scalability).

Additional context
Add any other context, metrics, screenshots, or examples about the enhancement here.

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Oct 27, 2026
  2. changed the title [-]Guardrails: Eval set for standalone guardrails[/-] [+]Evaluation: Structured dataset for validators[/+] on Oct 27, 2026
  3. moved this from To Do to In Review in Kaapi-devon Nov 2, 2026
  4. changed the title [-]Evaluation: Structured dataset for validators[/-] [+]Guardrails: Documentation and Testing[/+] on Nov 3, 2026
  5. moved this from In Review to In Progress in Kaapi-devon Nov 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

  • Status
    In Progress

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions