Skip to content

Establish CI customization variable convention - #2705

Open
rwgk wants to merge 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
rwgk:establish_ci_customizations
Open

Establish CI customization variable convention#2705
rwgk wants to merge 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
rwgk:establish_ci_customizations

Conversation

@rwgk

@rwgk rwgk commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Establish a CI_CUSTOMIZATIONS_* GitHub Actions variable convention for repository-specific workflow behavior. This lets an alternative synchronized repository opt into the shared NVIDIA Security Suite after its prerequisites are provisioned, without hard-coding private repository names in the public workflow.

The canonical NVIDIA/cuda-python behavior is unchanged. The new ci/README.md documents the namespace, fail-closed default, and current Security Suite opt-in.

xrefs:

  • ctk-next issue 529
  • ctk-next PR 550

Checklist

  • New or existing tests cover these changes. The workflow was exercised in the synchronized repository, and actionlint validates the final workflow.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

Allow synchronized repositories to opt into the shared Security Suite after its prerequisites are provisioned, while preserving the canonical public behavior. Document the CI_CUSTOMIZATIONS namespace for future repository-specific workflow settings.
@rwgk rwgk added this to the cuda.bindings 13.4.0 & 12.9.8 milestone Aug 26, 2026
@rwgk rwgk added P1 Medium priority - Should do CI/CD CI/CD infrastructure labels Aug 26, 2026
@rwgk rwgk self-assigned this Aug 26, 2026
@copy-pr-bot

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@rwgk

rwgk commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/ok to test

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rwgk
rwgk marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2026 22:06
@rwgk
rwgk requested a review from mdboom August 26, 2026 22:06

@mdboom mdboom left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CI/CD CI/CD infrastructure P1 Medium priority - Should do

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants