You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue #290 is addressed by PR #291. The current PTO-SPEC comparison contract requires matching physical shape/layout as well as valid shape. The API now rejects mismatched TCMP/TSEL physical geometry at compile time, while preserving same-geometry partial-column tiles (validCol < Cols). Validation: targeted compile-fail/positive tests 2/2 and existing engine contract tests 59/59. PR #291 is open and its required gate is running.
Activity
VV0003 commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Issue #290 is addressed by PR #291. The current PTO-SPEC comparison contract requires matching physical shape/layout as well as valid shape. The API now rejects mismatched
TCMP/TSELphysical geometry at compile time, while preserving same-geometry partial-column tiles (validCol < Cols). Validation: targeted compile-fail/positive tests 2/2 and existing engine contract tests 59/59. PR #291 is open and its required gate is running.