Skip to content

04 July 2017 #53

Description

@katjad

Sprint review and sprint revision for JS101 app

Our second Agile session. Thanks once again @msajara for facilitating it! I think we are sold on this approach now :)

See our updated board here: https://github.com/CodeHubOrg/organisations-database/projects/1
Photos here: https://github.com/CodeHubOrg/organisations-database/wiki/Sprint-Review-and-Sprint-Revision-04-July-2017

Sprint review (about the 'What')
Quick overview:

  • Clientside form validation done
  • Option to add tags working, but no specific functionality so far (looking up/suggesting exisiting tags etc), also not yet searching through added tags
  • Tests working, but those for components removed for the time being
  • Authentication (signing in step) working on JS101 site which was a test ground, found good tutorial to implement it on the app, started on that (using Passport and JSON web tokens)
  • Claudia presented a design proposal for mobile version of the app, and also suggestions for a logo. She also suggested the name 'pinJS' which we have adopted now! Design proposal here:
  • Was not a task, but staging site now online here https://resources.javascript101.co.uk and here: https://glitch.com/edit/#!/speckle-flat; webpack upgraded, plus option to run dev or production
    Todo:
  • Styles: Add Sass processing to site; research options for CSS grids to replace bootstrap
  • UX for desktop
  • Linting and Code Style
  • Refactoring!
  • Persistence layer and other tasks we have on product backlog

Sprint revision (about the 'How')
Feedback was generally very positive. Some comments:

  • System works
  • good dynamic
  • 'deadline' makes you focus
  • inclusive

@msajara also asked us to each write one word on a card. I remember 'okay', 'relieved', 'hopeful', 'clarity'

Things that could be improved:

  • As it's voluntary, there is some uncertainty about commitment
  • Limit to what current members can do in terms of code review, need more expertise

Actions

  • At each JS101 session, first hour will now be dedicated to the app
  • 4 weeks sprints; so every 4 weeks a review like this, up to an hour long
  • The sessions inbetween, have a more informal chat ("pinJS Happy hour")
  • Find mentors who could help with certain aspects (refactoring ?!), they could come over for an hour round lunchtime; or could perhaps come for one morning
  • Strategy for newcomers: Should feel included but not overwhelmed; a good way might be to ask feedback ("user research") - something we've actually done before

Note: After 18 July we will only meet again after 4 weeks, on 15 August

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions